Comment
Above in this comment thread:
RSS reader programmers: fix your referrer fields! » Which standard? » This standard... »
Comment
Oh, that standard
Posted by:
qmacro
at
2003-02-03
> http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.36
Ok, that standard. I thought you might be referring to some new fangled aggregator standard or something. Actually, re-reading the text in that link underlines the importance of not putting anything in there if it's not available (i.e. don't make things up):
"The Referer field MUST NOT be sent if the Request-URI was obtained from a source that does not have its own URI".
I'd got hold of the wrong end of the stick and thought you were saying that aggregators should be sending referer information, which is why I started wondering.
Thanks.
ttfn
dj